Bears aren't scared of bullies
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Hatch a scheme
Monday, December 7, 2009
Loving in truth a star
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Who are you? Ooh-ooh! Ooh-ooh! Oh tell me, who are you?
Monday, October 26, 2009
I think I've forgotten how to come up with catchy titles. I used to be really good at it, like, 2 years ago
Friday, October 23, 2009
Oh man!
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Hourly Haikus
Fire it up (WARNING: PRETENSION!)
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
WAAAAAAAUGH!
Monday, August 31, 2009
Please please please
Thursday, June 11, 2009
This post is heavily inspired by the book I mentioned last time, but whatevs, it was an inspiring book.
I want to make horror movies, but not horror-horror movies. How many times do skeletons pop out, does the main character go insane, do we have a masked killer?
These things don't scare us anymore, they don't make us fear walking down the street, they don't make us fear for our lives.
We need reality horror movies.
Movies that spend the whole time convincing you that yes, you are gay, and yes, that is horrible, and yes, society will hate you for it. You'll fear walking down the street after that, every time you pass another person, you'll fear for your life, scared they'll see through your heterosexual facade. Eventually you'll just retire to your house, boarded in, locked up, spend all your time on the internet, scared the government will bash in your door and drag you off to de-gay you.
We need movies that convince you that society is an evil thing and the only thing to do is get away from it all and write poetry. But your mother is dying and you need to pay her hospital bills and you have dependent kids you can't drag into the wild with you. You see the evil in your day-to-day proceedings, but you can't do anything about them. It's a lose-lose scenario, it's terrifying.
We need these movies, we need to convince the paying media that the world is a scary, scary place, where nothing will hide you from being persecuted for being yourself.
And then we'll release a comedy where everyone will fart and laugh and say homosexuality is great while not resorting to extremes and stereotypes.
It'll unite the world, it'll tear down all social structures, it'll make the world into a place that's good and pure and beautiful.
And that's when I'll take over.
Join me, and together we'll rule the world as author and audience.
-Lee
I'll fly to the moon
Sunday, June 7, 2009
I know I said I'd talk about the hulk, but fuck that, I want to talk about money.
Money has no value for me.
The government gave me $100. Don't ask me why, it was a tax return for a job I thought was under the table. Why they gave it to me and not some poor person or a program or anything more worthwhile I do not know. Anyways, I got $100. It's almost all gone now.
I took out $50 immediately for alcohol in the future. I spent $20 on a 3D movie and drink. Today I spent $15 on a book. It's almost all gone, as you can see.
But I want to talk about the book. It was Overqualified, by Joey Comeau. It was a good book, not a classic, but good, solid, I bought it today and I'm already half way through my second reading. I read it the first time in less than 2 hours on my way home from the book store.
I missed one of my stops. I ended up in a place I had never been before, despite the fact I shared a name with it. Lees station, I have no idea where it is on a map but I know it's on the transit way between Hurdman and Rideau.
It was then that I realized this book will take me places, it will open doors to me that I didn't even realize the purposes to open. And maybe the Lees bus adventure was entirely useless, but I saw a place I had never seen before, I had seen and noticed people I had never seen or noticed before. I saw an old Asian lady fall off a bus, while her son stood by waiting for her to get up. Why did he not help her? Why did no one else help her? Why were they getting off at Lees? I don't know these answers, but I can think about these people now. And that's an opportunity I wouldn't have had before.
The book cost $15, or about an hour and a half of minimum wage work. I read it in less that 2 hours. That's almost hour for hour, give for take.
I consider that worth it, I consider that a solid investment.
But I don't understand money.
-Lee
401: It's a Highway in Canada
Friday, May 29, 2009
But what this post is really about is... slippery slopes.
This is a term that pisses me off and I've been hearing a lot about it recently. The last time I heard it was about the new Scientology scandal with Wikipedia. Apparently the Church of Scientology has been editing some articles to show themselves in a kinder light, breaching the neutrality of the Wikipedia. So Wikipedia is banning the Church from editing the site, by following IP addresses and the rest of that stuff I don't understand.
I say this is a good step, it's a step towards Wikipedia banning all organizations from editing their own articles. THIS CANNOT BE A BAD THING. But apparently it's a slippery slope, because if we ban Scientologists from expressing their views, then where will we draw the line? Pretty soon the Muslims won't be able to talk about their prayers, and it's all downhill from there, because we cannot anger the Muslims.
I'm sorry, but this type of thinking pisses me off. From what I understand, Wikipedia has a policy, these people are breaking that policy, so they're banned. And they're not banning individuals, from what I understand, they're banning the computers in Churches of Scientology. If they really care enough to change the article, they could find a way.
But more than that, I'm so fuckin' sick of people using the slippery slope as an excuse. Yes, there's a fine line, and if you stumble, you'll fall. BUT THAT'S NOT AN EXCUSE NOT TO DO IT. People who say that it is don't have strong enough ideals, they don't know where their own line is. Because, really, if teaching Neo-National Socialism to a 7 year old girl falls on the acceptable side of that line, then what progress have we made? Have people really forgotten Nazis? Have we forgotten how evil they were? Have we forgotten the Holocaust, where 6 million Jews and at least 5 million gypsies, poles, soviets, radicals and homosexuals were starved, beaten, gassed, shot, burnt and killed as a "purging of society"?
We cannot forget about this, and we cannot allow it to happen again. 11 to 17 million people died as a result of that hatred, and each of those people was a person, who loved and sinned and lived. They lived until they died because of this intolerance. And what really gets me is that this happened because of conformity, because the common German citizen wanted to be like everyone else.
And we have people in our society teaching the same values and intolerance that killed 11 million people.
11. Million.
And there are people who do not want to take this child out of this house because it's a slippery slope from there.
Pardon my French, but what the fuck?
If, at the dawn of the 21st century, there are people repeating the sins of the 20th, then we've obviously gone nowhere. We should just pack our bags, turn in our two weeks notice, hail a cab, and tell it to take us to an empty field. And we'll sit there, looking at the grass and the flowers and the clouds passing by and wonder how, with all this beauty in the world, we can still hate, we can still question, we can still settle for anything less than total happiness and recklessness.
Because we can make a difference, we can say no to this intolerance, to teaching children evil. Because I remember the Holocaust, and I remember the White Rose.
-Lee
(Next time should be happier, I'm planning on talking about The Incredible Hulk)
I've been trying so hard
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Which is why I'm actually posting again today.
I made you a promise, internet, and I don't plan on going back on it.
So, as promised, Larry O'Brien rant.
Larry O'Brien is the mayor-dude of the fair city of Ottawa. Also a douche, but that's neither here nor there. Wait, yes it is.
Anyways, he's on trial right now for something I don't entirely understand, but I'm pretty sure it has something to do from obstructing the democratic process.
Basically, from my limited understanding, he promised someone else running for mayor a high-up job if they pulled out. I have been told this is what always happens with politicians. I think that's a terrible thing.
It seems undemocratic, to me at least. It is one man limiting the options of the people. And it involves one job high up going to someone who might not have the necessary skills for the job. That is pretty fuckin' irresponsible, in my opinion.
But the democracy thing grinds my gears even more. In my opinion, democracy's the shit, it's the bomb, it's all that and a bag of potato chips. The democratic process is basically anarchy, and I'm no anarchist, but I recognize how the mob can the right sometimes. The mob is only an idiot if an idiot leads them, but if the mob is given it's own power, if every member of the mob is allowed a completely free and open voice to say who they want to be their leader, then that's the only way society could possibly work.
Which is why this Larry O'Brien thing pisses me off. Larry O'Brien, and the other guy for accepting his deal, basically made the mob unable to say one thing. It took away an option, and democracy is at it's purest when there's many options on the table. Of course, the other dude couldn't've been too focussed on the mayorship, or else he wouldn't've fallen back, but still, he was an option, and he would've done a better job, I'd bet.
And I am completely in favour of the trial here. If this sort of thing happens all the time, then it's great that it's getting coverage, it's getting taken out of dark corners and back alleys. If this trial goes sour for Larry O'Brien, then it'll show all the other bullshit politicians, "Yeah, keep doing what you're doing, but we can't guarantee you won't get caught." And it'll make them that much more on edge about things, maybe even make a few not bother, the risk is too great, the mob would care too much.
And if things go good for Mr. O'Brien, then at least the mob would realize a little bit more about the corruption within politics, realize it affects them on a very real level. And knowledge like this can only lead to good things.
However, talking about a horse of a completely different colour, I had an amazingly good day today. Something in the water, I guess. I might've even had been served gelato by someone who was in a documentary I once saw. Polly Leger, if you happen to read this, could you possibly confirm whether or not you served banana chocko-chunk and banana strawberry gelato to a kid with brown hair wearing a corduroy suit jacket on May 12, 2009?
Man, I suck
Monday, May 11, 2009
Seriously, it's been, like, 3 months. I got two posts in and I quit.
I suck so bad.
But back into the swing of things.
I've been debating truth with myself, trying to figure out what it is, how to find it, et cetera.
Yeah, I'm pretty pretentious.
Anyways, today at school we had a guest speaker. A journalist, I should know his name, but I don't, because I'm a terrible person. So, he was talking about how he's always censored for sources and such who don't want their names to be in the news, and that really got me thinking.
These newspapers claim to say the irrevocable truth, the pure stories, just the facts, ma'am. They claim to have no outside influence, to say what is happening and nothing more.
But that is never the whole story, because how people react to it is a huge part of it. And journalists are our ties to the story. Sure, they have interviews and everything, but most people aren't willing to say how they really feel to a complete stranger. The journalist should have the balls to say how they feel about a story.
Which is why I really respect the real bloggers. The dudes and ladies on the internet who say real stuff and tell real stories with their names and opinions hanging out for all to see. I'm starting to think that these bloggers are the closest incarnate to truth that we have. Because they tell the stories, the good ones tell the whole story, with just the facts, and then say how they feel. Human emotion will always be part of the truth, no matter what.
Someone in my class asked if truth is a human construct, and I'm not entirely sure how to respond to that. Mostly because I'm not entirely sure what truth is. Like all ideals, we can't really understand it. To me, truth is a matter of perception. If you're completely honest about what you perceive, and how you feel about that, then you're being truthful. The problem there is that perception is a matter of bias. The act of looking at something is also the act of not looking at everything else. This makes the truth kind of a problem to figure out.
So what is truth, dog?
I don't know, I just know that if we have it, completely, then the earth would be a chiller place to live. Not that it isn't now, but y'know, parts of it suck.
Like Larry O'Brien, who I will rant about tomorrow.
On a lighter note, thisiswhyyourefat.com is a hilarious website.
-Peace
Lee
FUCKING X-TREME!!!!!!
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
I was snowboarding last week. But that isn't the point. On the way home, to complete my X-Treme transformation, I was listening to Sum 41. Does This Look Infected, their Junior release, to be exact.
I came to the song “Thanks for Nothing”. A friend in Grade 8 insisted the song was about pornography, so I always listened to it very carefully. This was no exception.
It also made me realize why I love Sum 41.
You see, the thing about Sum 41 is that they're hilarious people. At first listen, this song's, and the entire album, is an exception. But when you listen harder, and really get it, it changes. This is one of their greatest post-All Killer No Filler songs.
The key to this song is that it's a dialogue between the two characters. That's what most people don't get. People assume that it's two people yelling at you, one saying that life sucks (I'll never take part in the growing population / Or waste my time with further education) and the other one saying this sucks (Reality's a bore / You ask me to believe in something fake).
But no, as I said before, this is a dialogue, not a united front. It's one guy yelling about how much life sucks, and the other one yelling about how much he sucks (All I know is I've heard this all before). That line is the key to the song. The chorus guy, who I think is Derek, represents Johnny Everyteen, that is getting tired of the media. The verse is the media, telling Johnny that everyone is trying to manipulate and control him, but Johnny is finally waking up. Johnny is finally seeing that no one really cares about him, that reality is not as exciting as the media is telling him. Johnny finally reaches the conclusion that the media is doing nothing for him, which makes the title, “Thanks for Nothing”, makes sense.
So, Sum 41 is doing commentary about media distorting the truth of government by seemingly writing a song about distorting the truth of government.
And that's why they're genius.
Incidentally, this song also represents Sum 41 maturing as a band, which made them lose their original genius and become all angsty.
Introductions, Acadamy Awards, and Tim Horton's
Monday, February 23, 2009
Lee Molnar’s my name and learning is my business.
And by that I mean I’m still in High School, which means I’m yet another vacuous, shallow and angsty teenager polluting the blogosphere with my rambling rambles and thoughtless thoughts. GO TEAM LEE!
I’d also like to mention that I like writing and enjoying poetry, but when I say that, especially being so young, I feel like a poser.
If that was enough of an intro, I’d like to just jump right in.
The Oscars were on last night, and I know a lot of people don’t dig them, and I mostly don’t either. Their raw and unperturbed hatred of comedy and animation films seems kind of irresponsible, seeing as those films are among the very best.
But, my friends, I still dig the Oscars. And I will tell you why: It made me want to make movies.
I know it’s just a star studded affair with a lot of asshole and whores and that whole business, but that’s not the part I was talking about. I don’t want to make movies to go talk to fuckin’ Ben Mulroney, or to see my name up on the big screen. No, I want to make movies because of Slumdog Millionaire. I didn’t see the movie, mind you, but now I want to. Everyone who won an award for that movie was just so sincere and happy about it all. Anyone who saw their faces and knows anything like what they were feeling probably felt the same way I did. I’m not going to pretend that I know what it’s like to win an Oscar. What I’m saying is that I would like to.
Then, of course, I realize that I would never be able to do that. I could never make a movie.
Today’s post is a twofer, considering I also want to talk about Tim Horton’s. I like Tim Horton’s, they might have terrible coffee, but their soup is topnotch, their bagels are delicious, and their Iced Caps are very refreshing.
What I don’t like is “Roll up the Rim to Win”, and I’ll tell you why.
The contest started today, or recently, I only noticed it today. Anyways, after school I was super hungry, so I stopped in at a Tim Horton’s for a bagel. I usually get the Blueberry Bagel with Strawberry Cream Cheese. It is delicious.
Anyways, in line, I decided to get a coffee, as well, since “roll up the rim” was on and why the hell not, it was only a dollar. When I got there, not only did I realize that they didn’t have Blueberry Bagels (how I loathe that Tim Horton’s), but with the coffee, I didn’t have enough money. So, in a choice between a bagel I would enjoy, and a coffee I wouldn’t, I chose the coffee.
Because of “roll up the rim”.
This raises a disturbing question. Am I a slave to the corporation?
And another: Does it really matter if I am?
I’m almost tempted to not go to Tim Horton’s again, but I know tomorrow I’ll be back there getting another “roll up the rim” cup, in the hope of getting $10,000.
It’s like a lottery. A lottery for even stupider people.
Tune in next time! I’ll be talking about Sum 41!